Runcam Eagle 16:9 vs HS1189 test, latency insights

►FACEBOOK me:
Runcam Eagle 16:9 get it here:
!!!find the VIDEO INDEX and more INF down here!!!
Video index:
00:59 outside tests (video comparison)
03:45 Cameo Chihuahua
04:23 HS1177
04:46 the FOOLS CROWN (quad on the head)
05:05 Runcam Owl+
06:39 HANGAR: Latency tests - Runcam Eagle
07:22 Runcam Eagle menu options walkthroug
08:20 Foxeer HS1189 (XAT 1200) tests
08:52 HS1189 Menu options
10:12 Runcam Owl+ tests
10:29 Foxeer HS1177 (CCD) tests
10:57 Cams viewed (build quality)
12:10 CONCLUSION
13:58 Lenses / IR Filter?
►Runcam Eagle:
- WDR looks magic, like HDR picture
- has IR filter (red) on lens not on chip
- some latency
►Foxeer HS1189 / XAT 1200: (thank you Chase!)
- fast latency
- IR Filter is on CHIP
►Latency overview:
50ms Runcam Eagle (16:9)
50ms Foxeer HS1177
40ms Runcam Owl+
20ms Foxeer HS1189 (16:9)
►Conclusion:
HS1189: CMOS cams finally are at a good level (compared to CCD cams)! Latency is better than on HS1177!?
Runcam Eagle: best dynamic range I've seen so far - but with some latency. Both definitly a must for 16:9 Goggles/Screens!
►EQUIPMENT:
►►find infos on all my copters here in my Hangar:
Hangar filmed with:
Yi 4k, Panasonic GX8 + R0de Videomic
related Playlists:
►Multicopter DIVES
►Product Reviews:
►MiniQuad
►SUBSCRIBE:
►FACEBOOK me:
►visit my BLOG: