RunCam 2 vs. Foxeer: Video Quality Comparison

Video Channel
Please help us to find bad videos. Broken or unappropriated video content?
In this video we compare the video quality of the the RunCam 2 () and the Foxeer (). We perform this by mounting both the RunCam 2 and the Foxeer side by side on our mini quad. This video shows the center section of both videos right next to each other in order to enable you to compare the quality for yourself.
On our website you can find much more information about our test setup as well as snapshots from the raw footage and a short raw video sample: /
YouTube compression is hitting this splitscreen video exceptionally hard, particuarly those parts where there is a lot of change in the video (e.g., flying close to the ground). Please be aware that these compression artefacts are not visible in the raw video (and will probably less pronounced in non-splitscreen videos).
For both cameras, the latest firmware is used:
RunCam 2: Stock version (no update yet)
Foxeer: Firmware version 1.6
Other than updating the firmware, we left both cameras at their stock settings and recording at 1080p@60fps.
What do you think? Please write it into the comments.
The RunCam 2 is available directly from
RunCam:
Banggood:
The Foxeer is available from Surveilzone at:
In this video I'm flying my ZMR250, with these components:
ZMR250 frame:
LittleBee 20A ESCs:
DYS 1806 motors:
Naze32 FC:
Diatone PDB:
Eachine CCD/VTX set (but with the 25mW VTX instead!):
Eachine 25mW VTX:
1400 mAh 3s Lipo:
Fpvracer.lt is not the owner of this text/video/image/photo content, the real source of content is Youtube.com and user declared in this page publication as Youtube.com user, if you have any question about video removal, what was shared by open community, please contact Youtube.com directly or report bad/not working video links directly to video owner on Youtube.com. Removed video from Youtube.com will also be removed from here.